This is... Caitanya Mahaprabhu says that all the Upanisads, all the Vedic literature, Vedanta-sutra, they, they are composed in that way. Therefore mukhya-vrttye sei artha parama mahattva: "Therefore, if you take directly the meaning, that is the superexcellence of your understanding." Directly. Don't try to foolishly interpret. Just like in the Bhagavad-gita the first verse is,

"My dear Sanjaya, my sons, mamakah, my sons and Pandava, the sons of my younger brother, Pandu, they assembled in the battlefield which is also a pilgrimage. Then what did they do?" This is the simple... But the nonsense rascals, they are eschewing some meaning, "Oh, kuru-ksetra means 'body,' and dharma-ksetra means this and this... Pandava means 'the five senses.' " So many nonsensical... Even Gandhi has done this. What Gandhi? Gandhi's nothing. You see? So they are, these rascals are doing and misleading persons. I've recently written one written to Dr. Radhakrishnan that "You are going to retire. Now join this Krsna conscious movement. You have written your Bhagavad-gita, and you don't believe Krsna as Supreme Lord, God. Therefore by reading your Bhagavad-gita people have become godless. So you better rectify your mistake. Now join this." I've written state letter to Dr. Radhakrishnan. "So if you want to, I mean to say, compensate the greatest sin you have committed in your Bhagavad-gita, then you join this Krsna conscious movement and rectify yourself." "Not to Krsna."

"O My dear Arjuna, you just surrender unto Me. You worship Me. You offer your obeisances unto Me. You always think of Me." This is straight. The straight meaning, "Me," Krsna is saying. Therefore we should offer our respect to Krsna. We should worship Krsna. We should think of Krsna. We shall chant of Krsna. This is the straight meaning. But the commentator says, "Oh, not to Krsna." Just see. "Not to Krsna." So this nonsensical commentation is... Caitanya Mahaprabhu says, mukhya-vrttye. Mukhya-vrttye, directly, as you understand it. If I say, "My dear such and such, give me a glass of water," now you interpret, "Oh, Swamiji wants water. Oh, he has taken water. Let me supply this or that, interpretation," what is the use of interpreting? I'm asking for water. Give me water. Call a spade a spade. This should be the... This should be the understanding of Vedanta. Because all foolish nonsense, they are interpreting... "Such and such person's commentation of Vedanta-sutra." Because they were trying to manifest and expose their thinking power, that "I think that this should be like this." What nonsense you are? What you can think? You think as it is. This is... Caitanya Mahaprabhu says. Don't think otherwise. As it is. In the Upanisads, isavasyam idam sarvam: "Everything belongs to God." Believe it as belongs to God. Don't interpret. Then you'll understand Vedas. Isavasyam idam sarvam yat kincit jagatyam jagat: [Iso mantra 1] "Anything, any minute thing in this material world, everything belongs to that Supreme Lord." Who can deny it? Why do you interpret? Tena tyaktena bhunjitha: "So you enjoy as He orders you."

In the Tenth Chapter you'll find this word, aham sarvasya prabhavah. So things should be accepted as they are. (aside:) Have you got it?

There are so many isvaras, controller, but Paramesvara, or the Supreme Lord, supreme controller, is Krsna. Isvarah paramah krsnah sac-cid-ananda-vigrahah [Bs. 5.1]. People may misunderstand, "Oh, Krsna, we have seen Him. He's a historical person. How He can be the supreme controller? He's just like a man. He's a man like us." No. He's sac-cid-ananda-vigrahah [Bs. 5.1]. He's not like a man like you. His form is spiritual, blissful, eternal. "How it is eternal? We have known that He is born." That Krsna says, janma karma me divyam yo janati tattvatah: [Bg. 4.9] "How I am born, what are My activities, if anyone knows..." Then what he becomes? Oh, tyaktva deham punar: "He becomes immediately liberated."

Now Caitanya Mahaprabhu is directly challenging Prakasananda Sarasvati. Prakasananda Sarasvati belonged to the Sankara-sampradaya, Sankara school of thought. Now Caitanya Mahaprabhu is directly challenging that gauna-vrttye yeba bhasya karila acarya. Acarya means Sankaracarya. Sankaracarya has made a commentary which is called Sariraka-bhasya of Vedanta-sutra. So Caitanya Mahaprabhu says this Sariraka-bhasya, gauna-vrttye, indirectly... Just like we are accustomed to do: "I think the meaning should be like this," grammatical or this way or that way, jugglery of words. So Caitanya Mahaprabhu directly accuses Sankaracarya that the commentary which he has made indirectly, if we read that commentary or if we hear that commentary, then tahara sravane nasa haya sarva karya, then anyone who is hearing or trying to understand the Sariraka-bhasya, he is going to hell. He's not only wasting his time, but he's going to hell. Sarva nasa. Sarva nasa means "all auspicity lost." Why? Why lost? Lost because as soon as you indulge in the reading of the Sankara-bhasya, the whole program is you have to think that "I am God." So if I am God, then who is else God, that I have to worship? That means the prospect of devotional service, or Krsna consciousness, is killed forever. Such rascal will never be able to come to Krsna consciousness. Therefore he says, haya sarva nasa. He is being murdered, you see, because he never will come. He'll always think, "I am God." Just like... Who was speaking? Yes, yes, Nikhilananda. He has discussed in that Vivekananda's speech that man is God. But somebody asks, "Why he has become dog?" "Oh," he says, "I do not know." So God says, "I do not know." He's such a God. And that is clearly written. Have you got that book? God, God, God... The followers of Sankaracarya say that "I am God. There is no other God. Every one of us God." Then why you have become dog? "Oh, that I do not know." Is that God's, I mean to say, answer? If I ask if you are God, if I answer you, "Why you are dog?" you say, "I do not know," so are you God? God does not know? Well, God description is there in Parasara-sutra that He is full of all knowledge. That is God. And God says, "I do not know"? How he is...? What kind of God he is? That is clearly stated here. Why you have become dog? "I do not know. But I am God." He knows, "I am God," but he does not know why he has become dog. That is his knowledge. You'll find so many fallacies like this. How do you know that you are God? "That also I do not know." What is this? Is this any argument?

Means Bhagavan, the Supreme Personality of Godhead, is, is, He has got complete aisvarya, wealth, He has got complete fame, He has got complete knowledge, He has got complete beauty, and He has got complete renunciation. By these six complete, I mean..., opulences, the God is there. So if you find somebody, that He's full in six opulences... So we find Krsna. If you find in the history... Whole history of the world till now, you won't find any other person more than Krsna. Therefore He is God. Therefore He is God. Find out from the history if anybody is more than Krsna.